lawjobs.com News And Views
  • This Site
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
  • lawjobs.com Home
    • Post a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • Find a Job
  • Job Seekers >>
    • Create a Job Alert
    • Post Resume
    • Sign In/Sign Up
    • Find a Job
  • Employers >>
    • Media Kit
    • Search Resumes
    • Sign In/Sign Up
    • Post a Job
  • News & Views >>
    • Profiles
    • Compensation Matters
    • Tips -for Success
    • Career News
  • Directories >>
    • Temporary Legal Staffing
    • Legal Associations
    • Law Firms & Employers
    • Legal Recruiters
  • Related Sites >>
    • The Careerist Blog
    • Public Interest lawjobs.com
  • Help

    Home > News & Views > Morrison & Foerster Lowers California Starting Pay

    Font Size: increase font decrease font

    Morrison & Foerster Lowers California Starting Pay

    By Amanda Royal All Articles 

    The Recorder

    October 20, 2009

    •    
    •    
    •    
    •      
     

    ImageZoo

    Morrison & Foerster said Monday it will pay incoming associates $145,000 in offices outside of New York and Asia, making it one of the first firms to publicly state it won't pay California first-year associates as much as those in the Big Apple.

    For the past few years, associates in California and New York have typically made $160,000 at the top firms, while those in other markets could expect to make less.

    But MoFo Chairman Keith Wetmore said there's long been a difference between the California and New York markets.

    "Except for some periods during the last decade, there's been a historical difference between New York and the rest of the country, reflecting different billing rates, among other things," Wetmore said.

    The announced salaries are not set in stone, a firm statement said.

    "Note, however, that the market for first-year salaries among national firms is undetermined at this time. Given that, we will continue to assess starting salaries, in light of market trends, and may elect to adjust as required based on larger market developments," the statement said.

    Wetmore said salaries aren't likely to fall further.

    "It would surprise me if the market went lower than that," Wetmore said.

    Associate salaries have taken a hit this year, with many AmLaw 100 firms freezing or lowering compensation or going off lockstep altogether.

    Several firms have already stopped paying existing first-years $160,000, among them Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, which is now paying them $144,000; and DLA Piper, which announced a return to $145,000 as part of 10 percent salary cuts for associates across the board.

    Others have announced they'll pay newly arriving first-years less: Howrey just started paying $125,000 under its new apprenticeship model. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton has announced internally that first-years joining this fall and winter will be paid $145,000. And Townsend and Townsend and Crew recently announced it will reduce first-year associate salaries from $160,000 to $145,000 in 2010.

    Some industry experts predict the market will blur further as more firms shift from lockstep models to merit-based compensation. At the same time, industry experts expect more firms to pare first-year pay back to $145,000.

    Lisa Smith, who heads Hildebrandt's law firm consulting practice, including associate management and finances, has estimated that about one-third of large law firms are seriously looking at merit-based compensation models, and has predicted far more variation in associate salaries going forward.



    Subscribe to The Recorder

    You must be signed in to comment on an article

    Find similar content

    Companies, agencies mentioned

        
    • Morrison & Foerster
    • Big Apple
    • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips
    • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

    Most viewed stories

        
    1. Crises Just Another Day at Work for Woman Behind TV's 'Scandal'
      •      
    2. Reaping the Benefits of Ethical Blogging
      •      
    3. Ex-Dictator Convicted of Genocide in Guatemala
      •      
    4. Inside the Roberts Court
      •      
    5. Michigan Dean Says Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs
      •      
    lawjobs.com

    TOP JOBS

    MORE JOBS

    POST A JOB

    From the Law.com Network

    3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

    Best Legal Departments 2013

    News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

    Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

    Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

    Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

    Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

    Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

    Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
    Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

    Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

    Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

    Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

    Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

    Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

    Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

    Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    The Law.com Network
    • ADVERTISE

    law.com

    • Newswire
    • Special Reports
    • International News
    • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
    • Legal Blogs
    • Site Map

    alm national

    • The American Lawyer
    • The Am Law Litigation Daily
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal

    alm regional

    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • GC New York
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • The Asian Lawyer
    • Focus Europe

    directories

    • ALM Experts
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
    • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
    • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
    • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
    • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
    • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

    books & newsletters

    • Best-Selling Books
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • Law Journal Newsletters
    • LawCatalog Store
    • Law Journal Press Online

    research

    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Court Reporters
    • MA 3000
    • Verdict Search
    • ALM Experts
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Smart Litigator

    events & conferences

    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech®
    • Virtual LegalTech®
    • Virtual Events
    • Webinars & Online Events
    • Insight Information

    reprints

    • Reprints

    online cle

    • CLE Center

    career

    • Lawjobs
    About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions