lawjobs.com News And Views
  • This Site
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
  • lawjobs.com Home
    • Post a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • Find a Job
  • Job Seekers >>
    • Create a Job Alert
    • Post Resume
    • Sign In/Sign Up
    • Find a Job
  • Employers >>
    • Media Kit
    • Search Resumes
    • Sign In/Sign Up
    • Post a Job
  • News & Views >>
    • Profiles
    • Compensation Matters
    • Tips -for Success
    • Career News
  • Directories >>
    • Temporary Legal Staffing
    • Legal Associations
    • Law Firms & Employers
    • Legal Recruiters
  • Related Sites >>
    • The Careerist Blog
    • Public Interest lawjobs.com
  • Help

    Home > News & Views > Legal Heavyweights Lean on NALP to Track Nonequity Partners

    Font Size: increase font decrease font

    Legal Heavyweights Lean on NALP to Track Nonequity Partners

    By Leigh Jones All Articles 

    The National Law Journal

    April 8, 2010

    •    
    •    
    •    
    •      
     


    Image: Law.com/Photodisc Red

    Related Items

    • Firms Breathe Sigh of Relief Over NALP Change on Recruiting
    • What Women Want: Law Firm Partnership Details

    A group of 75 judges, prominent attorneys and legal scholars has fired off a letter to NALP in hopes of pressuring the organization to rethink its decision not to track nonequity partner numbers at law firms.

    The letter calls for NALP, formerly the National Association for Law Placement, to include nonequity partner information in the data it provides to the public about major U.S. law firms. The group behind the letter asserted that because minorities and women make up a disproportionate number of nonequity partners, the information is crucial to getting an accurate picture of diversity numbers within member law firms.

    The two-page letter, dated April 6, was in response to a decision by NALP in December not to collect nonequity numbers, despite assurances by the organization that it would begin doing so. NALP Executive Director James Leipold said that NALP had to pull back on those assurances because law firms were balking at providing the information. He said that firms refused to reveal nonequity numbers because NALP's questionnaire asked them to identify nonequity partner numbers on an office-by-office basis. Firms were concerned that parsing the information that way could jeopardize attorney privacy by revealing the partner status of individual lawyers.

    The letter was authored by Fernande Duffly, a judge on the Massachusetts Appeals Court; Nancy Gertner, a judge for the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts; and Julia Huston, a partner with Foley Hoag in Boston. Among those who signed their names to the letter were William Lee, co-managing partner of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; Walter Reed, managing partner of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge; John Montgomery, managing partner of Ropes & Gray; Robert Post, dean of Yale Law School; Martha Minnow, dean of Harvard Law School; Larry Kramer, dean of Stanford Law School; and Carolyn Lamm, president of the American Bar Association.

    "We were surprised and dismayed to learn that NALP had decided to suspend collection of equity and non-equity partner demographic information for the 2010-2011 NAPL Directory of Legal Employers," the letter said.

    Leipold said that NALP "is on the same page" as those who signed the letter and that the organization was considering how to most effectively collect the nonequity data. The NALP board of directors will take up the issue during its April 26 meeting, he said.

    "We are committed to collecting this data in the next data collection cycle, though since we have not decided how to do it yet, I cannot tell you what our approach will be," Leipold said.

    The letter cites statistics that show women make up fewer than 17 percent of equity partners at major law firms, and minorities make up about 5.4 percent of that group.

    The tussle over NALP's decision about nonequity data follows criticism that the organization received earlier this year about its moves to change the guidelines for on-campus recruiting. After some backlash from law firms, NALP backed off a plan that would have banned firms from making any offers to second-year law students before mid-January.



    Subscribe to The National Law Journal

    You must be signed in to comment on an article

    Find similar content

    Firms mentioned

        
    • Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge
    • Foley Hoag
    • Ropes & Gray
    • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
    • Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge
    • Foley Hoag
    • Ropes & Gray
    • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

    Companies, agencies mentioned

        
    • Massachusetts Appeals Court
    • US District Court
    • American Bar Association
    • 2010-2011 NAPL Directory of Legal Employers
    • Massachusetts Appeals Court
    • US District Court
    • American Bar Association
    • 2010-2011 NAPL Directory of Legal Employers

    Key categories

        
    • Law Firm Administration
    • Law Firm Associates
    • Law Firm Administration
    • Law Firm Associates

    Most viewed stories

        
    1. Reaping the Benefits of Ethical Blogging
      •      
    2. Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
      •         
        • Subscription Required
    3. Michigan Dean Says Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs
      •      
    4. Pa. Natural Gas Industry Fuels a Surge in Legal Work
      •      
    5. Crises Just Another Day at Work for Woman Behind TV's 'Scandal'
      •      
    lawjobs.com

    TOP JOBS

    MORE JOBS

    POST A JOB

    From the Law.com Network

    Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

    Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

    News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

    Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

    Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    LegalTech West Coast to Kick Off With 'Tech Audit' Keynote

    Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

    Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

    Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

    Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

    Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
    Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

    Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

    NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

    Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

    Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

    Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

    Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

    Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
    •      
      • Subscription Required

    The Law.com Network
    • ADVERTISE

    law.com

    • Newswire
    • Special Reports
    • International News
    • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
    • Legal Blogs
    • Site Map

    alm national

    • The American Lawyer
    • The Am Law Litigation Daily
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal

    alm regional

    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • GC New York
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • The Asian Lawyer
    • Focus Europe

    directories

    • ALM Experts
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
    • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
    • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
    • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
    • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
    • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

    books & newsletters

    • Best-Selling Books
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • Law Journal Newsletters
    • LawCatalog Store
    • Law Journal Press Online

    research

    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Court Reporters
    • MA 3000
    • Verdict Search
    • ALM Experts
    • Legal Dictionary
    • Smart Litigator

    events & conferences

    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech®
    • Virtual LegalTech®
    • Virtual Events
    • Webinars & Online Events
    • Insight Information

    reprints

    • Reprints

    online cle

    • CLE Center

    career

    • Lawjobs
    About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions